Harun Farocki: What Ought to be Done / Was getan werden soll. Harun Farocki Institut & Motto Books.

Posted in film, Motto Books, writing on August 16th, 2016 by l w
Tags: ,

Harun-Farocki_Was-Getan-Werden-soll_What-ought-to-be-done_9782940524501_Harun-Farocki-Institut_Elsa-de-Seynes_Motto-Books_2016_1_DeutscheHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_5_EnglishHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_2_DeutscheHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_6_EnglishHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_3_DeutscheHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_7_EnglishHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_4_DeutscheHarun Farocki_Was Getan Werden soll_What ought to be done_9782940524501_Harun Farocki Institut_Elsa de Seynes_Motto Books_2016_8_English

In the mid-1970s, Harun Farocki wrote a two-page call programmatically entitled What Ought to Be Done, followed by a survey addressed to potential collaborators and supporters. He envisioned an institution to “organize a coalition of working people, not from an abstract understanding but from the contact points of their work.” The purpose of this institution, devoted to documentary practices, was twofold. It was “intended to collect, i.e. secure what is there,” but also “to produce, i.e. initiate what is not yet there.” In doing so, it was meant to facilitate social and collaborative processes, comprehensive and interdisciplinary studies without time pressure.

At the occasion of Farocki’s working paper, the Harun Farocki Institut, founded in 2015, historically situates Farocki’s initiative and reflects upon the proximities and differences between creating an institution in 1976 and forty years later.

The publication includes Farocki’s text, a commentary by Tom Holert, Doreen Mende and Volker Pantenburg, as well as a letter written in 1975 by documentary filmmaker Peter Nestler in response to Farocki’s circular.

Editorial responsibility: Elsa de Seynes.

€5.00

Buy it